Sociometric Study of Intragroup Relations in a Work Group

  • Gelmar García Vidal Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
  • Laritza Guzmán Vilar Investigadora independiente
  • Reyner Francisco Pérez Campdesuñer Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
  • Betty Alexandra Rivera Rivera Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
Keywords: Organizational behavior, groups, intragroup relations, sociometry


The aim of this study is to explore intragroup relations in retail. The article conduct a sociometric analysis that takes into account labor and affective criteria, using the probability theory method and the UCINET program. In so doing the paper observe that the group, despite having been formally established for more than five years, does not display any solid indicators of high cohesion. The article observe that formal authority and informal leadership do not coincide and that there are two group factions in both criteria, which supports the finding of low cohesion. But despite these deficiencies in terms of cohesion, paper do not find any completely ignored or solitary individuals; as such, the group has established relations that can be improved. To this end, group cohesion should be promoted through a work design that facilitates interaction between individuals and rewards group results, all of which will serve to enhance the performance of this group.


View per year:  
Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gelmar García Vidal, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
Profesor a tiempo completo de la Facultad de Ciencias Amdinistrativas
Laritza Guzmán Vilar, Investigadora independiente
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Sede Santo Domingo
Reyner Francisco Pérez Campdesuñer, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
Profesor a tiempo completo de la Facultad de Ciencias Amdinistrativas
Betty Alexandra Rivera Rivera, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial
Estudiante de la carrera de Administración de Empresas y Negocio


Ballesteros-Pérez, P., González-Cruz, M. C., & Fernández-Diego, M. (2012). Human resource allocation management in multiple projects using sociometric techniques. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 901-913. doi:

Barrasa, A., & Gil, F. (2004). Un programa informático para el cálculo y la representación de índices y valores sociométricos. Psicothema, 16(2), 329-335.

Bezanilla, J. M. (2011). Sociometría: Un método de investigación psicosocial. (First ed.). México D.F: PEI Editorial.

Bezanilla, J. M., & Miranda, M. A. (2012). La socionomía y el pensamiento de Jacobo Levy Moreno: Una revisión teórica. Revista de Psicología GEPU, 3(1), 148 - 180.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural Relationships, Job Characteristics, and Worker Satisfaction and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 331-348. doi:

Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539. doi:

Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social Interaction Effects Following a Technological Change: A Longitudinal Investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 869-898.

Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1 Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation), 104-127. doi:

Casales, J. C. (1990). Psicología Social: contribución a su estudio. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Sociales.

Cuesta Santos, A. (2005). Gestion del Talento humano y del Conocimiento. Bogotá: ECO Ediciones.

Chancellor, J., Layous, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2015). Recalling Positive Events at Work Makes Employees Feel Happier, Move More, but Interact Less: A 6-Week Randomized Controlled Intervention at a Japanese Workplace. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 871-887. doi:

Chiavenato, I. (2009). Gestión del talento humano. (Third ed.). Mexico: McGRAW-HILL/INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V.

Chruden, H., & Sherman, A. (2007). Administración del personal. (28 ed.). Mexico: Trillas.

Dailey, R. (2012). Comportamiento Organizacional. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.
Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. (1999). Comportamiento humano en el trabajo. Mexico: McGraw-Hill.

Ebers, M. (1997). Explaining Inter-Organizational Network Formation. In M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of interorganizational networks. (pp. 3-40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fernández, R. M. (1991). Structural Bases of Leadership in Intraorganizational Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(1), 36-53. doi:

Forselledo, A. G. (2010). Introducción a la sociometría y sus aplicaciones. Montevideo: UNESU.

Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603- 625. doi:

Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding Groups in Organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 124-128). Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.

Gutiérrez, J. H., Astudillo, C. A., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Mora-Melià, D., & Candia-Véjar, A. (2016). The multiple team formation problem using sociometry. Computers & Operations Research, 75 150-162. doi:

Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 288-290). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Hackman, J. (1992). Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations. In M. D. D. a. L. M. Hough (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 235-250). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Hart, J. W., & Nath, R. (1979). Sociometry in Business and Industry: New Developments in Historical Perspective. Group Psychotllerapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 32(128-149).

Henttonen, K. (2010). Exploring social networks on the team level—A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 27, 74-109. doi:

Hoffman, C. C., & Wilcox, L. (1992). Sociometric applications in a corporate environment. Journal Of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 45(1), 3-16.

Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some Differences Make a Difference: Individual Dissimilarity and Group Heterogeneity as Correlates of Recruitment, Promotions, and Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 675-689. doi:

Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1986). The Snowball Effect: Turnover Embedded in Communication Networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 50-55. doi:

Kuz, A., & Falco, M. (2013). Herramientas sociométricas aplicadas al ambiente áulico. Paper presented at the Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Informática/Sistemas de Información (CONAIISI 2013), Córdoba.

Kuz, A., Falco, M., Nahuel, L., & Giandini, R. (2015). Agent SocialMetric: herramienta de asistencia al docente para determinar el clima social y la estructura del aula. Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa(22), 16-29.

Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B. (1998). Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55- 67. doi:

Laet, S. D., Doumen, S., Vervoort, E., Colpin, H., Leeuwen, K. V., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2014). Transactional Links Between Teacher–Child Relationship Quality and Perceived Versus Sociometric Popularity: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 85 (4), 1647-1662. doi:

Lawless, P. (2015). Application of sociometric methods to collaborative coastal management. Journal of Coastal Conservation (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 19 (5), 653-665. doi:

Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 38-50. doi:

Lussier, R. N. (1993). Human Relations in Organizations: A Skill Building Approach. (2nd ed.). Homewood, II: Richard D. Irwing.

McCain, B. E., O'Reilly, C., & Pfeffer, J. (1983). The Effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover: The Case of a University. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 626-641. doi:

Mizruchi, M. S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1993). Networks of Interorganizational Relations. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(1), 46 -70. doi:

Moreno, J. L. (1947). Contributions of Sociometry to Research Methodology in Sociology. American Sociological Review, 12(3), 287-292. doi:

Moreno, J. L. (1954). Fundamentos de la sociometría. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Mullena, B., Symonsa, C., Hua, L.-T., & Salasb, E. (1989). Group Size, Leadership Behavior, and Subordinate Satisfaction. Journal of General Psychology, 116(2), 155-170. doi:

Nelson, R. E. (1989). The Strength of Strong Ties: Social Networks and Intergroup Conflict in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377-401. doi:

Orbach, M., Demko, M., Doyle, J., Waber, B. N., & Pentland, A. S. (2015). Sensing Informal Networks in Organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 508-524. doi:

Pineda, I., Renero, L., Silva, Y., Casas, E., Bautista, E., & Bezanilla, J. M. (2009). Utilidad del sociograma como herramienta para el análisis de las interacciones grupales. Psicologia para América Latina, (16). Retrieved from

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Comportamiento organizacional. (13th ed.) Mexico: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN.

Roberts, K. H., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1979). Some Correlations of Communication Roles in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 42-57. doi:

Ruiz Berrio, L. (2014). El sociograma como instrumento de evaluación del clima de aula. Grado en Maestro en Educación Primaria, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Navarra.

Sabin, S. I., Mihai, S., & Marcel, P. (2014). The Importance and Utility of the Sociometric Survey Method in Physical Education Research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 117(19 ), 185-192. doi:

Salvosa, L. R. (1935). Tables for statisticians. Michigan: Edwards brothers, Incorporated, lithoprinters and publishers.

Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational Psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity Loss in Performance Groups: A Motivation Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 67-81. doi:

Shrader, C. B., Lincoln, J. R., & Hoffman, A. N. (1989). The Network Structures of Organizations: Effects of Task Contingencies and Distributional Form. Human Relations, 42(1), 43-66. doi:

Sociedade Paranaense de Psicodrama. (2006). Sociometria como fundamento teórico do psicodrama. Curitiba: Sociedade Paranaense de Psicodrama.

Soponaru, C., Tincu, C., & Iorga, M. (2014). The Influence of the Sociometric Status of Students on Academic Achievement. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports, 5(10), 149-168.

Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552. doi:

Tavares De Almeida, K. N., Fischer, A. L., Takahashi, A. R. W., Freitag, B. B., Gomes Enoque, A., & De Brito, M. J. (2012). Configuração de posições em uma comunidade epistêmica e sua relação com o sentido da aprendizagem em redes interorganizacionais: estudo de caso no campo da biotecnologia. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 13(6), 77-106. doi:

Thomas, E. J., & Fink, C. F. (1963). Effects of Group Size. Psychological Bulletin, 60(4), 371-384. doi:

Tichy, N. M., & Tushman, M. L. (1979). Network Analysis in Organizational Settings. Human Relations, 32(11), 923-965. doi:

Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social Network Analysis for Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519. doi:

Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1984). Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top-Management Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 74-92. doi:

Walker, G. (1985). Network Position and Cognition in a Computer Software Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 103-130. doi:

Werther, W. B., & Davis, K. (2008). Administración de recursos humanos. El capital humano de las empresas. (6th ed.). Mexico: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana Editores, S.A. de C.V.

Yamkovenko, B., & Tavares, S. (2017). To Understand Whether Your Company Is Inclusive, Map How Your Employees Interact. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

Yetton, P., & Bottger, P. (1983). The Relationships Among Group Size, Member Ability, Social Decision Schemes, and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(2), 145-159. doi:

Zhukova, N. V., Lozhkin, A. I., & Guseva, I. S. (2016). Sociometric Method of the Research of Hidden Conflicts in the Small Professional Groups on the Basis of Zondi Deep Inducements. SIS Journal of Projective Psychology & Mental Health., 23(1), 47-52.
How to Cite
García Vidal, G., Guzmán Vilar, L., Pérez Campdesuñer, R., & Rivera Rivera, B. (2018). Sociometric Study of Intragroup Relations in a Work Group. Journal of Business, Universidad Del Pacífico (Lima, Peru), 10(2), 48-69.