Student commitment to technology in times of COVID–19: public universities in southern Peru during the bicentenary of independence

Authors

  • Elsa Emma Neira Ponce
  • Freddy Leónidas Corrales Peralta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/jb.2021.1622

Keywords:

engagement académico, tecnología, universidad pública, covid-19

Abstract

Peru was no different to any other country in having to tackle Covid-19, but it did as it was preparing to celebrate the bicentenary of its independence. Great changes therefore had to be made to the celebrations as well as to other aspects of national life--especially the education sector, in which universities witnessed radical alterations to the teaching--learning process. Students had to learn using technology, despite often lacking the necessary equipment or being accustomed to other forms of learning behavior. Therefore, it is important to explore the extent to which students and their professors have been committed to the use of technology across different courses. Many studies have shown that academic engagement is a construct that encourages student learning, interest, well-being, and performance. However, a key problem in this line of enquiry involves determining the relationship between student commitment and the use of ICT in the learning process; these technologies are particularly important at present, even though some research has found that students only use it as a distraction. Therefore, in the present study we seek to determine the relationship between student commitments to learning and the technology they use in the process. In so doing we yielded an acceptable Spearman R correlation of 0.417, which indicates that there is in fact a correlation between the use of technologies and student engagement. This means that students are committed to technology even when their socio-economic levels mean they cannot afford to purchase these new tools. In turn, the information we collected alongside professors indicated a moderate correlation of 0.376, indicating that although professors are committed to teaching, they still do not have much of a relationship with technology and make limited use of it in the classroom.  Thus, in sum, we found that students are closer to these forms of technology while their professors remain at a stage of adaptation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Karaki, J. N., Ababneh, N., Hamid, Y., & Gawanmeh, A. (2021). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education during COVID-19 Global Crisis: UAE Educators? Perspectives. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep311. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10945
Area Moreira, M. (2014). La alfabetizaci?n digital y la formaci?n de la ciudadan?a del siglo XXI. Revista Integra Educativa, 7(3), 21?33.
Ballesteros Herencia, C. A. (2019). La representaci?n digital del engagement: Revista de Comunicaci?n, 18(1), 215?233. https://doi.org/10.26441/rc18.1-2019-a11
C?ceres, K. F. (2020). Educaci?n virtual: Creando espacios afectivos, de convivencia y aprendizaje en tiempos de COVID-19. CienciAm?rica, 9(2), 38?44. http://dx.doi.org/10.33210/ca.v9i2.284
Cajas Bravo, V., Paredes Perez, M. A., Pasquel Loarte, L., & Pasquel Cajas, A. F. (2020). Habilidades sociales en Engagement y desempe?o acad?mico en estudiantes universitarios. Comuni@cci?n: Revista de Investigaci?n En Comunicaci?n y Desarrollo, 11(1), 77?88. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.11.1.405
Colomina ?lvarez, R., Mauri Maj?s, T., Coll Salvador, C., & Onrubia, J. (2005). La calidad de los contenidos educativos reutilizables: dise?o, usabilidad y pr?cticas de uso. RED: Revista de Educaci?n a Distancia, 2, 4.
D?az Guillen, P. A., Andrade Arango, Y., Hincapi? Zuleta, A. M., & Uribe Uran, A. P. (2021). An?lisis del proceso metodol?gico en programas de educaci?n superior en modalidad virtual. Revista de Educaci?n a Distancia (RED), 21(65), 1?41. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.450711
Diego, L., & Aires, B. (2007). PROFESORES Y ESTUDIANTES HACI?NDOSE COMPETENTES CON LAS TIC?: UNA VISI?N GLOBAL Alejandra Bosco ( 2007 ) 889- UAB. 11.
Font, M., & Gargant?, B. (2008). Psicolog?a de la educaci?n virtual . Ense?ar y aprender con las tecnolog?as de la informaci?n y. January.
Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 703?718. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X160778
las tecnologias de la informacion y la comunicacion, (2002). http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/venezuela_2002_es.pdf
Jordan, K., David, R., Phillips, T., & Pellini, A. (2021). Education during the COVID-19: crisis Opportunities and constraints of using EdTech in low-income countries. Revista de Educaci?n a Distancia (RED), 21(65), 1?15. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.453621
McInnis, C. (2001). Researching the First Year Experience: where to from here? Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 105?114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360120064376
Medrano, L. A., Moretti, L., & Ortiz, A. (2015). Medici?n del Engagement Acad?mico en Estudiantes Universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 1(40), 114?124.
Mirvis, P. H. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal ExperienceFlow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, by Csikszentmihalyi Michael. New York: Harper & Row, 1990, 303 pp., $19.95, cloth. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 636?640. http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1991.4279513%0Ahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876%0Ahttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511621956/type/book
Molina, O. E., Reynaldo, D., Cancell, F., & Hern?ndez, G. (2021). El engagement en la educaci?n virtual?: experiencias durante la pandemia COVID-19 Engajamento na educa??o virtual?: experi?ncias durante a. Linguagem e Tecnologi, 17. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33936
Nuevas tecnolog?as y educaci?n. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2021, from http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-10492005000100007
Organizaci?n, U. N. A., Sector, D. E. L., La, S. D. E., & Cali, C. D. E. (2013). Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=79829185005.
Scale, W. E. (n.d.). Utrecht work engagement scale.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht work engagement scale Preliminary Manual Version 1.1. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University, December, 1?60. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01350-000
Schaufeli, Wilmar B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293?315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

Downloads

Published

2022-01-19

How to Cite

Neira Ponce, E. E., & Corrales Peralta, F. L. (2022). Student commitment to technology in times of COVID–19: public universities in southern Peru during the bicentenary of independence. Journal of Business, Universidad Del Pacífico (Lima, Peru), 13(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.21678/jb.2021.1622