But I didn't sign anything... Notes on the application of "non-consensual" non-signatory party theories in consensual" theories of non-signatory parties in Peruvian law

Authors

  • Guillermo Fernando Cabieses Crovetto University of Lima image/svg+xml
  • Rodrigo Vega Méndez PUCP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v12i16.1906

Keywords:

Arbitration, Arbitration agreement, Non-signatory parties

Abstract

Although arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism that relies on consent, there are some who claim that, in certain circumstances, the incorporation of a non-signatory party is explained by considerations of good faith or equity, and not properly by consent. This article attempts to determine whether such “non-consensual” theories truly deserve an independent category under Peruvian law.

Author Biographies

  • Guillermo Fernando Cabieses Crovetto, University of Lima

    Master of Laws (LLM) from the University of Chicago. Lawyer by the University of Lima.

  • Rodrigo Vega Méndez, PUCP

    Lawyer by the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Portada Forseti Nº 16

Downloads

Published

2022-08-02

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 16 (2022): Forseti N° 16

Section

Artí­culos

How to Cite

But I didn’t sign anything... Notes on the application of "non-consensual" non-signatory party theories in consensual" theories of non-signatory parties in Peruvian law. (2022). Forseti. Law Review, 12(16), 07-36. https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v12i16.1906