The Mirage of Deliberation: Artificial Intelligence and Improper Delegation in Peruvian Arbitration

Authors

  • Débora Graciano Chávez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/je6rm096

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Arbitration, Delegation, Deliberation, Annulment of arbitral award

Abstract

Artificial intelligence can find precedents, organize arguments, and even draft an arbitral award. But can it decide? In arbitration, parties do not merely choose an outcome: they choose the person who will construct it. The real boundary lies not in using technology, but in allowing it to replace the arbitrator’s judgment. Because if an algorithm reasons and the arbitrator signs, who really decided?

Author Biography

  • Débora Graciano Chávez

    Estudiante de derecho en la Universidad del Pacífico. Practicante del área de Solución de Controversias del Estudio Rodrigo, Elías & Medrano. Asistente de docencia de los cursos Derecho de las Inversiones y Teoría General del Proceso en la misma casa de estudios. Forma parte de la directiva del Círculo de Arbitraje de la Universidad del Pacífico. Asociada Ex Miembro de la Asociación DERUP Editores – Revista Forseti.

Forseti N° 24

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 24 (2026): Vol. 15 Núm. 24 (2026): Forseti N° 24

Section

Artí­culos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Forseti. Law Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Mirage of Deliberation: Artificial Intelligence and Improper Delegation in Peruvian Arbitration. (2026). Forseti. Law Review, 15(24), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.21678/je6rm096