The Principle of Objective Impartiality in Public Procurement: The Case of the Sanctioning Procedure and the Request for Reconsideration under the New General Public Procurement Law

Authors

  • Anthony Wilman Peralta Delgado
  • Piero Amadeus Rojas Vásquez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/4qqre665

Keywords:

Principle of impartiality, Due process, Administrative sanctioning procedure, Public procurement, Reconsideration appeals

Abstract

The principle of objective impartiality requires that an authority that previously intervened in a dispute not participate again in a later stage of it. However, the regulation of sanctioning proceedings and request for reconsideration under the General Public Procurement Law may undermine this guarantee. In this regard, this paper examines both issues and proposes alternatives to align the regulation with such requirements.

Author Biographies

  • Anthony Wilman Peralta Delgado

    Abogado por la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú. Maestrando en la Maestría en Derecho Administrativo y Regulación del Mercado de la Universidad de Piura.

  • Piero Amadeus Rojas Vásquez

    Abogado por la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas. Magíster en Derecho Medioambiental por la Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, Castilla-La Mancha, España y en Derecho Administrativo y Administración Pública por la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Profesor de Derecho Administrativo en la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú.

Forseti N° 24

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 24 (2026): Vol. 15 Núm. 24 (2026): Forseti N° 24

Section

Artí­culos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Forseti. Law Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Principle of Objective Impartiality in Public Procurement: The Case of the Sanctioning Procedure and the Request for Reconsideration under the New General Public Procurement Law. (2026). Forseti. Law Review, 15(24), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.21678/4qqre665