Mixing apples with oranges or how to counterclaim human rights violations in investment arbitration

Authors

  • Uber López Montreuil Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
  • Adriana Garcés García Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
  • Eduardo Dibos Universidad del Pacífico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v0i10.1102

Keywords:

Investment arbitration, Human Rights, ICSID, State Counterclaim

Abstract

This article analyzes potential counterclaims of a State in an investment arbitration. Thus, the authors make a general revision of the fundamental concepts of investment arbitration focus in ICSID proceedings. On that basis, they verify thepossibility to support the State’s counterclaim in the consent of the investor in its different manifestations. Finally, the authors develop the problems of invoke a violation of human rights as basis of the State counterclaim.

Published

2019-07-31

How to Cite

López Montreuil, U., Garcés García, A., & Dibos, E. (2019). Mixing apples with oranges or how to counterclaim human rights violations in investment arbitration. Forseti. Law Review, 7(10), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v0i10.1102

Issue

Section

Artículos