But I didn't sign anything... Notes on the application of "non-consensual" non-signatory party theories in consensual" theories of non-signatory parties in Peruvian law

Authors

  • Guillermo Fernando Cabieses Crovetto Universidad de Lima
  • Rodrigo Vega Méndez PUCP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v12i16.1906

Keywords:

Arbitration, Arbitration agreement, Non-signatory parties

Abstract

Although arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism that relies on consent, there are some who claim that, in certain circumstances, the incorporation of a non-signatory party is explained by considerations of good faith or equity, and not properly by consent. This article attempts to determine whether such “non-consensual” theories truly deserve an independent category under Peruvian law.

Author Biographies

Guillermo Fernando Cabieses Crovetto, Universidad de Lima

Master of Laws (LLM) from the University of Chicago. Lawyer by the University of Lima.

Rodrigo Vega Méndez, PUCP

Lawyer by the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Published

2022-08-02

How to Cite

Cabieses Crovetto, G. F., & Vega Méndez, R. (2022). But I didn’t sign anything. Notes on the application of "non-consensual" non-signatory party theories in consensual" theories of non-signatory parties in Peruvian law. Forseti. Law Review, 12(16), 07–36. https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v12i16.1906

Issue

Section

Artículos