Expert systems in the Peruvian judiciary: The case of Amauta Pro

Authors

  • Gianfranco Mejía Trujillo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v14i22.2827

Keywords:

Expert Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Amauta Pro, Judiciary, Decision-making, Interoperability, Transparency, Legal Reasoning

Abstract

This article analyzes Expert Systems as part of Artificial Intelligence systems that seek to provide relevant input for decision-making. To this end, we refer to the case of Amauta Pro, which was recently developed by the Peruvian Judiciary, to explain its characteristics, benefits, limitations, success criteria, and opportunities for improvement in its implementation.

Author Biography

Gianfranco Mejía Trujillo

Abogado especializado en Gestión Pública, Regulación, Derecho Administrativo e Inteligencia Artificial. Posee una experiencia de más de 20 años en el sector público peruano, habiendo ejercido diversos cargos directivos. Es Director del Programa Especializado en Regulación de la Inteligencia Artificial (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas) y miembro del Observatorio Sector Público e Inteligencia Artificial (OspIA) y del CAIDP Fall 2024 AI Policy Clinic Research.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Mejía Trujillo, G. (2025). Expert systems in the Peruvian judiciary: The case of Amauta Pro. Forseti. Law Review, 14(22), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v14i22.2827

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 22 (2025): Forseti N° 22

Section

Artí­culos

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Forseti. Law Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.