Black box arbitrators? Limits on the use of generative artificial intelligence in arbitration under the principle of the non-delegability of the arbitral function

Authors

  • Danae Lucienn Ramos Granados

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v14i22.2832

Keywords:

Intuitu personae nature, Principle of non-delegability, Arbitral functions, Generative artificial intelligence, Appointment of arbitrators, Decision-making process, Tribunal secretary

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence in the practice of international arbitration has catalyzed a complex debate on its compatibility with the integrity of the arbitral process, specifically with the intuitu personae nature, regarding the possible scenarios of prohibited delegation of the arbitrator’s inherent functions to these digital tools, transgressing the principle of non-delegability of the arbitral function.

Author Biography

Danae Lucienn Ramos Granados

Egresada de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Asistente de Investigación en el Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law (BCCE) de la University of Berkeley, California. Asistente de cátedra de Derecho Internacional Privado en la PUCP. Miembro del Consejo Editorial de la Revista Ius Inter Gentes. Exeditora en jefe de Themis-Revista de Derecho.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Ramos Granados, D. L. (2025). Black box arbitrators? Limits on the use of generative artificial intelligence in arbitration under the principle of the non-delegability of the arbitral function. Forseti. Law Review, 14(22), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v14i22.2832

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 22 (2025): Forseti N° 22

Section

Artí­culos

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Forseti. Law Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.