Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.58/59.558Keywords:
New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, MarxAbstract
In this paper, we consider the two main causation mechanisms characterizing Marxian theory: the one running from productive forces to relations of production (Marx I) and the other moving in the opposite direction (Marx II). We argue that Marx did not achieve a satisfactory integration of the two mechanisms and that he failed to point out how multiple technological institutionalpaths may stem from the cumulative interactions between relations of production and productive forces. In spite of many important analytical insights, NIE has exacerbated the primacy of technology and productive forces, which characterized «Marx I». After NIE, the analysis of thecomplex relations between «Marx I» and «Marx II» can still help to extend the scope of institutional theory and, in particular, its application to the comparative analysis of models of capitalism coexisting in the global economy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-04-08
How to Cite
Pagano, U. (2006). Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics. Apuntes. Social Sciences Journal, (58/59), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.58/59.558
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Apuntes publishes all its articles and reviews under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license with the objective of promoting academic exchange worldwide. Therefore, articles and book reviews can be distributed, edited, amended, etc., as the author sees fit. The only condition is that the name of the author(s) and Apuntes. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (as the publisher) be cited.

.jpg)