Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics

Authors

  • Ugo Pagano Universidad de Siena

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.58/59.558

Keywords:

New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, Marx

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the two main causation mechanisms characterizing Marxian theory: the one running from productive forces to relations of production (Marx I) and the other moving in the opposite direction (Marx II). We argue that Marx did not achieve a satisfactory integration of the two mechanisms and that he failed to point out how multiple technological institutionalpaths may stem from the cumulative interactions between relations of production and productive forces. In spite of many important analytical insights, NIE has exacerbated the primacy of technology and productive forces, which characterized «Marx I». After NIE, the analysis of thecomplex relations between «Marx I» and «Marx II» can still help to extend the scope of institutional theory and, in particular, its application to the comparative analysis of models of capitalism coexisting in the global economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2006-04-08

How to Cite

Pagano, U. (2006). Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics. Apuntes. Social Sciences Journal, (58/59), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.58/59.558

Issue

Section

Articles